I have read extensively the arguments for and against wireless cameras. I understand the logic that if you have to have a cable for power anyway, then much of the apparent simplicity of wireless is lost and you might as well run a single cable that does both the job of providing power and of transmitting data.
However, in my case I am looking to provide coverage at the bottom of my garden and drive. Two cameras could cover the entire area, one mounted on the garage wall and one a shed wall. Both of these outbuildings already have mains power and line-of-sight to my home office in the house, where ideally I would locate a recording device.
Hence I see great advantage in wireless cameras, which would preclude the need for running long cables which would have to cross paved surfaces somehow and require holes in the wall of the house. Power could be supplied quite simply from inside the shed and garage to each camera.
From an aesthetics point of view, I would prefer a more subtle dome style camera.
Is there anything I am missing in my thought process? Are there any cameras that would suit my desired requirements?
However, in my case I am looking to provide coverage at the bottom of my garden and drive. Two cameras could cover the entire area, one mounted on the garage wall and one a shed wall. Both of these outbuildings already have mains power and line-of-sight to my home office in the house, where ideally I would locate a recording device.
Hence I see great advantage in wireless cameras, which would preclude the need for running long cables which would have to cross paved surfaces somehow and require holes in the wall of the house. Power could be supplied quite simply from inside the shed and garage to each camera.
From an aesthetics point of view, I would prefer a more subtle dome style camera.
Is there anything I am missing in my thought process? Are there any cameras that would suit my desired requirements?